Identifying areas with large proportion of households with significant food energy gaps or livelihood change strategies that can endanger lives or livelihoods. The IPC Classification System distinguishes and links acute food insecurity, chronic food insecurity and acute malnutrition to support more strategic and better coordinated responses. The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) is a set of analytical tools, and processes, to analyseand classifythe severity of a food security situation according to scientific international standards. Then it presents its strengths (one of IPC's advantages is to be a "common currency" for reporting used by all countries and donors). This is a standardized framework for situation analysis expressed in a scale that integrates food security, nutrition and livelihood related information into a clear statement of food security status. The IPC Acute Food Insecurity (IPC AFI) classification provides strategically relevant information to decision makers that focuses on short-term objectives to prevent, mitigate or decrease severe food insecurity that threatens lives or livelihoods. By providing a set of definitions and standards for classifying the diverse food insecurity scenarios and their impact on human lives and livelihoods, the IPC makes it easier for multi-sectoral stakeholders to identify priorities and facilitate the coordination of response efforts. Main obstacles in Food Security Analysis and Classification Lack of clarity and consistency regarding the use of terms and classifying food security situations This has resulted in: 2 . The protocols used by the IPC are harmonized across the three individual scales (IPC Acute Food Insecurity, IPC Chronic Food Insecurity, and IPC Acute Malnutrition). 9.6 million people in Sudan are estimated to be in high acute food insecurity (IPC Phase 3 and above) between June and September 2020 The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) is a joint initiative from: CARE, F AO, the. This course provides guidance to complete the Protocols for the Integrated Phase Classification of Acute Food Insecurity. IPC: Integrated food security classification 1 Minimal More than four in five households (HHs) are able to meet essential food and non-food needs without engaging in atypical, unsustainable strategies to access food and income. 25 April 2019, Rome - New global guidelines published today by the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) initiative will further hone food security and nutrition analysis processes for better and more actionable information during humanitarian crises. Classification and monitoring of th is food insecurity is an important step towards identifying and addressing vulnerabilities in Tajikistan. The IPC was originally developed in 2004 to be used in Somalia by FAO’s Food Security and Nutrition Analysis Unit (FSNAU). Classifying Famine (IPC Phase 5), the fifth phase of food insecurity, is a technically rigorous process that requires analytical conclusions that meet three specific criteria: At least one in five households faces an extreme lack of food More than 30 percent of children under … insecurity. IPC The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) Global Partners Integrated Food Security Phase Classification Technical Manual Version 2.0.0 I3000E/1/06.12 ISBN 978-92-5-107284-4 9 789251 072844 Evidence and Standards for Better Food Security Decisions The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) Global Partners www.ipcinfo.org Global Acute Malnutrition (GAM) is expressed by thinness of individuals and/or presence of oedema. Current Acute Food Insecurity Situation June-Sept 2020. By using the IPC classification and analytical approach, Governments, UN Agencies, NGOs, civil society and other relevant actors, work together to determine the severity and magnitude of acute and chronic food insecurity, and acute malnutrition situations in a country, according to internationally-recognised scientific standards. Each function has a specific purpose and a set of guiding protocols to follow, to ensure that the IPC analyses are rigorous, neutral and accountable. FEWS NET Remote Monitoring countries use a colored outline to represent the highest IPC classification in areas of concern. IPC-compatible analysis follows key IPC protocols but does not necessarily reflect the consensus of national food security partners. The Problem 2 Stressed Even with any humanitarian assistance at least one in five HHs in the area have the This course provides guidance to complete the Protocols for the Integrated Phase Classification of chronic food insecurity. IDPs/Other Settlement Classification Area recieves significant humanitarian food assistance (accounted for in Phase Classification) At least 25% of households meet 25-50% of caloric needs from humanitarian food assistance At least 25% of households meet over 50% of … The IPC is conducted according to four mutually supporting functions: (1) Building technical consensus, (2) Classifying severity and identifying drivers, (3) Communicating for action; and (4) Ensuring adherence to protocols.